tokenpockettokenpocket苹果官网下载|ethics and law
tokenpockettokenpocket苹果官网下载|ethics and law
Difference Between Law and Ethics (with Comparison Chart) - Key Differences
Difference Between Law and Ethics (with Comparison Chart) - Key Differences
Business
Finance
Banking
Education
General
Law
Science
IT
English
Key DifferencesKnow the Differences & Comparisons
Difference Between Law and Ethics
In simple terms, the law may be understood as the systematic set of universally accepted rules and regulation created by an appropriate authority such as government, which may be regional, national, international, etc. It is used to govern the action and behavior of the members and can be enforced, by imposing penalties.
Many times the term law is juxtaposed with the term ethics, but there is a difference, as ethics are the principles that guide a person or society, created to decide what is good or bad, right or wrong, in a given situation. It regulates a person’s behavior or conduct and helps an individual in living a good life, by applying the moral rules and guidelines.
For a layman, these two terms are same, but the fact is that there is a difference between law and ethics. Read the article carefully, to overcome your ambiguities.
Content: Law Vs Ethics
Comparison Chart
Definition
Key Differences
Conclusion
Comparison Chart
Basis for Comparison LawEthics
MeaningThe law refers to a systematic body of rules that governs the whole society and the actions of its individual members.Ethics is a branch of moral philosophy that guides people about the basic human conduct.
What is it?Set of rules and regulationsSet of guidelines
Governed ByGovernmentIndividual, Legal and Professional norms
ExpressionExpressed and published in writing.They are abstract.
ViolationViolation of law is not permissible which may result in punishment like imprisonment or fine or both.There is no punishment for violation of ethics.
ObjectiveLaw is created with an intent to maintain social order and peace in the society and provide protection to all the citizens.Ethics are made to help people to decide what is right or wrong and how to act.
BindingLaw has a legal binding.Ethics do not have a binding nature.
Definition of Law
The law is described as the set of rules and regulation, created by the government to govern the whole society. The law is universally accepted, recognized and enforced. It is created with the purpose of maintaining social order, peace, justice in the society and to provide protection to the general public and safeguard their interest. It is made after considering ethical principles and moral values.
The law is made by the judicial system of the country. Every person in the country is bound to follow the law. It clearly defines what a person must or must not do. So, in the case of the breach of law may result in the punishment or penalty or sometimes both.
Definition of Ethics
By ethics, we mean that branch of moral philosophy that guides people about what is good or bad. It is a collection of fundamental concepts and principles of an ideal human character. The principles help us in making decisions regarding, what is right or wrong. It informs us about how to act in a particular situation and make a judgment to make better choices for ourselves.
Ethics are the code of conduct agreed and adopted by the people. It sets a standard of how a person should live and interact with other people.
Types of Ethics
Key Differences Between Law and Ethics
The major differences between law and ethics are mentioned below:
The law is defined as the systematic body of rules that governs the whole society and the actions of its individual members. Ethics means the science of a standard human conduct.
The law consists of a set of rules and regulations, whereas Ethics comprises of guidelines and principles that inform people about how to live or how to behave in a particular situation.
The law is created by the Government, which may be local, regional, national or international. On the other hand, ethics are governed by an individual, legal or professional norms, i.e. workplace ethics, environmental ethics and so on.
The law is expressed in the constitution in a written form. As opposed to ethics, it cannot be found in writing form.
The breach of law may result in punishment or penalty, or both which is not in the case of breach of ethics.
The objective of the law is to maintain social order and peace within the nation and protection to all the citizens. Unlike, ethics that are the code of conduct that helps a person to decide what is right or wrong and how to act.
The law creates a legal binding, but ethics has no such binding on the people.
Conclusion
Law and ethics are different in a manner that what a person must do and what a person should do. The former is universally accepted while the latter is ideal human conduct, agreed upon by most of the people. Although, both the law and ethics are made in alignment so that they do not contradict each other. Both go side by side, as they provide how to act in a particular manner. Every person is equal in the eyes of law and ethics, i.e. nobody is superior or inferior. Further, these two allow a person to think freely and choose.
You Might Also Like:
Difference Between Moral and Morale
Difference Between Civil Law and Criminal Law
Difference Between Act and Law
Difference Between Morals and Ethics
Difference Between Ethics and Values
Difference Between Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct
Comments
Sharon Alvaranga says
July 27, 2016 at 2:24 pm
Literature was very informative and easy to understand.
Reply
Shar Thor says
March 29, 2018 at 5:21 am
Very detailed and user friendly information
Reply
Julia says
August 12, 2018 at 11:52 am
A very nicely written piece
Reply
kristy says
September 5, 2018 at 10:04 am
very good to read and a good way of explaining law and ethics
Reply
Brian says
October 17, 2020 at 1:40 am
Thanks to the author who sat and made those highlights.
precise and straight on point
Reply
raphael says
December 2, 2018 at 1:39 pm
can i have difference between law and policy
Reply
Ben Sam says
February 8, 2019 at 7:47 pm
Thank you, Keydifferences.com ! Very Cool!
Reply
Char says
February 15, 2019 at 2:45 am
Thank you, Keydifferneces.com. Your explanation was very precise and easy to understand.
Reply
George Addai says
September 9, 2019 at 6:00 pm
Law and ethics with is superior?
Reply
Lee says
November 5, 2019 at 5:32 am
This is a very detailed and informative write-up. I have truly learned a lot as a student studying MA Journalism. Thank you.
Reply
Koreen Donald says
March 11, 2020 at 3:58 am
Easy way to understand. thankyou
Reply
jayne says
March 13, 2020 at 5:30 am
Well written and easy to read and understand
Reply
Elizabeth Nwaeke says
April 23, 2020 at 11:52 am
Excellent article! Easy to understand!! I love it!
Reply
ross C dawson says
August 17, 2020 at 6:03 am
Most helpful,
Clear and good examples
Reply
Kawu liman Ahmad says
November 20, 2020 at 10:29 am
I appreciate what you do, I like it, u helped me, thank you so much
Reply
Athunga Emmilly says
November 24, 2020 at 11:00 am
Thank you to the panel that sat down to explain the differences between the law and ethics. God bless you all
Reply
Alex says
December 24, 2020 at 8:18 am
Good article
Reply
NESDUKE HARMONY says
January 22, 2021 at 4:28 pm
Very informative!! I fully understand the difference between law and ethics now.
MANY THANKS!!!
Reply
Ben Fitzgerald says
March 2, 2021 at 10:44 am
Totally understandable piece of writing and very informative.
Reply
Melissa Lucas says
March 19, 2021 at 2:45 am
Very informative and understandable break down of differences between law and ethics. Thank you.
Reply
Kathy A Harlan says
August 22, 2021 at 10:25 pm
This was very informative and helped me understand the difference between laws and ethics in a concrete manner. Thank you!
Reply
Acquah Billie Richard says
March 17, 2022 at 12:38 am
this is very concise and understandable
Reply
victor says
May 22, 2022 at 5:06 pm
sounds cool
Reply
Samuel cadhor Reec says
August 8, 2022 at 6:57 pm
this is help and support in study
Reply
Ahmed Mohammed says
August 20, 2022 at 8:02 am
It is really very helpful to differentiate Law and Ethics to Easly understand.
Reply
Yogesh Prakash Gaikwad says
September 1, 2022 at 5:40 pm
The content is put up in simple words in a layman language.
Thanks to the author for being generous to provide this notes
Reply
yesim ozbarlas says
January 10, 2023 at 12:02 am
Very detailed and informative wrting.
Reply
Tina Hadley says
January 17, 2023 at 1:05 am
This article was great at providing clarity between ethics and laws.
Reply
Dezmond Skipper says
January 22, 2023 at 5:44 am
Excited about showing my understanding of ethics and law.
Reply
ilimo ferran says
May 30, 2023 at 9:49 pm
I am happy it is really easy to understand
Reply
KUNDA I N MWELWA says
July 19, 2023 at 11:05 pm
It is very informative
Reply
Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment * Name *
Email *
Website
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Top 5 Differences
Difference Between PERT and CPM
Difference Between Micro and Macro Economics
Difference Between Developed Countries and Developing Countries
Difference Between Management and Administration
Difference Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research
New Additions
Difference Between Introduction and Executive Summary
Difference Between Programmed and Non-programmed Decisions
Difference Between Depreciation and Devaluation of Currency
Difference Between Consumer Market and Business Market
Difference Between Manufacturing and Service Operations
Difference Between Currency and Money
Difference Between ACH and Wire Transfer
Difference Between Vowels and Consonants
Difference Between Revising and Editing
Difference Between Who’s and Whose
Categories
Banking
Business
Education
English
Finance
General
IT
Law
Science
Copyright © 2024 · Key Differences · Contact Us · About Us · Privacy
Page restricted | ScienceDirect
Page restricted | ScienceDirect
Your Browser is out of date.
Update your browser to view ScienceDirect.
View recommended browsers.
Request details:
Request ID: 864456ffae5e110b-HKG
IP: 49.157.13.121
UTC time: 2024-03-14T12:41:46+00:00
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/97.0.4692.71 Safari/537.36
About ScienceDirect
Shopping cart
Contact and support
Terms and conditions
Privacy policy
Cookies are used by this site. By continuing you agree to the use of cookies.
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V., its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the Creative Commons licensing terms apply.
Ethics and Law
Ethics and Law
Skip to main content
Accessibility help
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Login Alert
Cancel
Log in
×
×
Home
Log in
Register
Browse subjects
Publications
Open research
Services
About Cambridge Core
Cart
Cart
Institution login
Register
Log in
Cart
Home
Home
Log in
Register
Browse subjects
Publications
Open research
Services
About Cambridge Core
Cart
Cart
Institution login
Register
Log in
Cart
< Back to search results
HomeBooksEthics and Law
Ethics and Law
Ethics and Law
An Introduction
Search within full text
Get access
Buy a print copy
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Cited by 3
Cited by
3
Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
2015.
Books Received.
Philosophy,
Vol. 90,
Issue. 1,
p.
167.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Oeter, Stefan
2019.
Conflicting Norms, Values, and Interests: A Perspective from Legal Academia.
Ethics & International Affairs,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 1,
p.
57.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Hapla, Martin
2019.
(Ne)morální advokáti: problém ospravedlnění norem profesní etiky.
Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 4,
p.
457.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
×
W. Bradley Wendel, Cornell University, New York
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
October 2014
Print publication year:
2014
Online ISBN:
9781107337114
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337114
Series:
Cambridge Applied Ethics
Subjects:
Law,
Ethics,
Philosophy,
Jurisprudence
30.99
(USD)
Digital access for individuals
(PDF download and/or read online)
Add to cart
Added to cart
Digital access for individuals
(PDF download and/or read online)
View cart
Export citation
Buy a print copy
Share
Information
Information
Contents
References
Metrics
Book description
Can someone be a good person yet act in a professional role that may involve deception, procedural trickery, withholding information, and working on behalf of terrible people and institutions? This question is at the heart of legal ethics. Using cases from around the common-law world, W. Bradley Wendel looks at issues including confidentiality, the moral responsibility of lawyers, and truth and deception in advocacy. He then examines the classic questions of philosophy of law, including the nature of law, positivism, natural law, the relationship between law and morality, unjust legal systems, and the obligation to obey the law. Finally, he considers the ethical issues surrounding the role of lawyers, including criminal defense and prosecution, civil litigation, counseling clients on the law, and representing corporations. Combining the theoretical, philosophical, and practical, his book will be of vital interest to students of law, the philosophy of law, ethics, and political philosophy.
Reviews
‘A superb, engaging and accessible introduction to the intersection of ethics and law.'
Adam Dodek - University of Ottawa
Aa Reduce text
Aa Enlarge text
Refine List
Classifications
Actions for selected content:
Select all |
Deselect all
View selected items
Save to my bookmarks
Export citations
Download PDF (zip)
Save to Kindle
Save to Dropbox
Save to Google Drive
Save content to
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
You are about to save
Your Kindle email address
Please provide your Kindle email.
@free.kindle.com
@kindle.com (service fees apply)
By using this service, you agree that you will only keep content for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services
Please confirm that you accept the terms of use.
Cancel
Save
×
Save Search
You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".
Search Title: required
Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
Contents
Contents
Select Frontmatter
Frontmatter
pp i-iv
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select Contents
Contents
pp v-vi
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select Preface
Preface
pp vii-x
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select Part I - Lawyers, ethics, and the law
Part I - Lawyers, ethics, and the law
pp 1-2
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select 1 - Defining the problem
1 - Defining the problem
pp 3-20
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select 2 - Justifying principles of professional ethics
2 - Justifying principles of professional ethics
pp 21-42
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select 3 - The adversary system
3 - The adversary system
pp 43-61
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select 4 - The nature of law and why it matters
4 - The nature of law and why it matters
pp 62-88
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select 5 - Legal obligation and authority
5 - Legal obligation and authority
pp 89-105
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select 6 - Unjust laws and legal systems
6 - Unjust laws and legal systems
pp 106-128
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select Part II - The many roles of lawyers
Part II - The many roles of lawyers
pp 129-130
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select 7 - Criminal defense and the problem of client selection
7 - Criminal defense and the problem of client selection
pp 131-155
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select 8 - Prosecutors
8 - Prosecutors
pp 156-172
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select 9 - Civil litigation
9 - Civil litigation
pp 173-199
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select 10 - Counseling clients
10 - Counseling clients
pp 200-215
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select 11 - Representing corporations: lawyers as gatekeepers?
11 - Representing corporations: lawyers as gatekeepers?
pp 216-235
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select References
References
pp 236-247
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
Select Index
Index
pp 248-251
Get access
Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
Log in
Register
Export citation
References
ReferencesSecondary sourcesAlexy, Robert, The Argument from Injustice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, Paulson, Bonnie Litschewski and Paulson, Stanley L., trans. 2002).Amsterdam, Anthony, and Bruner, Jerome, Minding the Law (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 2000).Applbaum, Arthur Isak, Ethics for Adversaries (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1999).Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologica, in Baumgarth, William P. and Regan, Richard J., eds., Aquinas on Law, Morality, and Politics (Indianapolis: Hackett, 2nd edn., 2002), pp. 10–69.Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem (New York: Viking 1963).Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics. Ross, W. D. and Urmson, J. O. trans., in Ackrill, J. L., ed., A New Aristotle Reader (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1984).Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined (London: J. Murray 1832).Aviel, Rebecca, “Why Civil Gideon Won’t Fix Family Law,” Yale Law Journal 122: 2106–24 (2013).Babcock, Barbara, “Defending the Guilty,” Cleveland State Law Review 32: 175–87 (1983).Barrett, Edward F., “The Adversary System and the Ethics of Advocacy,” Notre Dame Lawyer 37: 479–88 (1962).Bazerman, Max H., and Tenbrunsel, Ann E., Blind Spots: Why We Fail to Do What’s Right and What to Do About It (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2011).Bazyler, Michael J., “Gray Zones of Holocaust Restitution: American Justice and Holocaust Morality,” in Petropoulos, Jonathan and Roth, John K. eds., Gray Zones: Ambiguity and Compromise in the Holocaust and Its Aftermath (New York: Berghan Books 2005), pp. 339–59.Berlin, Isaiah, “The Pursuit of the Ideal,” in Hardy, Henry, ed., The Crooked Timber of Humanity (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1990), pp. 1–19.Binder, Guyora, “Critical Legal Studies,” in Patterson, Dennis, ed., A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Malden, Mass.: Blackwell 1996), pp. 280–90.Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979).Bok, Sissela, Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life (New York: Pantheon Books 1978).Boon, Andrew, and Levin, Jennifer, The Ethics and Conduct of Lawyers in England and Wales (Oxford: Hart, 2nd edn. 2008).Burnett, D. Graham, A Trial by Jury (New York: Knopf 2001).Butler, Paul, “How Can You Prosecute Those People?,” in Smith, Abbe and Freedman, Monroe H., eds., How Can You Represent Those People? (New York: Palgrave MacMillan 2013), pp. 15–27.Carr, Albert Z., “Is Business Bluffing Ethical?,” Harvard Business Review (Jan.–Feb. 1968): 143–53.Carrington, Paul D., “Unconscionable Lawyers,” Georgia Law Review 19: 361–94 (2002).Cassidy, R. Michael, “Some Reflections on Ethics and Plea Bargaining: An Essay in Honor of Fred Zacharias,” San Diego Law Review 48: 93–110 (2011).Cassidy, R. Michael, “Character and Context: What Virtue Theory Can Teach Us About a Prosecutor’s Ethical Duty to ‘Seek Justice,’” Notre Dame Law Review 82: 635–97 (2006).Clemmer, Christopher D., “Obstructing the Bernardo Investigation: Kenneth Murray and the Defence Counsel’s Conflicting Obligations to Clients and the Court,” Osgoode Hall Review of Law and Policy 1: 137 (2008).Clermont, Kevin M., Standards of Decision in Law (Durham, N.C.: Carolina Academic Press 2013).Cochran, Johnnie L., “How Can You Defend Those People?,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 30: 39–43 (1996).Code, Michael, “Ethics and Criminal Law Practice,” in Woolley, Alice et al., eds., Lawyers’ Ethics and Professional Regulation (Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis 2008).Coffee, John C., “The Attorney as Gatekeeper: An Agenda for the SEC,” Columbia Law Review 103: 1293–1316 (2003).Cohen, Steven M., “What Is True? Perspectives of a Former Prosecutor,” Cardozo Law Review 23: 817–28 (2002).Cole, David, No Equal Justice: Race and Class in the American Criminal Justice System (New York: New Press 1999).Coleman, Jules, “Negative and Positive Positivism,” in Cohen, Marshall, ed., Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence (Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Allanheld 1983), pp. 28–48.Cooper, Austin, “The Ken Murray Case: Defence Counsel’s Dilemma,” Criminal Law Quarterly 47: 41 (2009).Cover, Robert M., Justice Accused (New Haven: Yale University Press 1975).Crenshaw, Kimberle, “A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Law and Politics,” in Kairys, David, ed., The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique (New York: Pantheon Books, revised edn. 1990), 195–218.Dagger, Richard, “Political Obligation,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Damaška, Mirjan R., The Faces of Justice and State Authority (New Haven: Yale University Press 1986).Daniels, Norman, “Reflective Equilibrium,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Dare, Tim, The Counsel of Rogues? A Defence of the Standard Conception of the Lawyer’s Role (Farnham: Ashgate 2009).Darley, John M., “The Cognitive and Social Psychology of Contagious Organizational Corruption,” Brooklyn Law Review 70: 1177–94 (2005).Dauer, Edward A., and Leff, Arthur Allen, “Correspondence: The Lawyer as Friend,” Yale Law Journal 86: 573–84 (1976).Davis, Evan A., “The Meaning of Professional Independence,” Columbia Law Review 103: 1281–92 (2003).Dershowitz, Alan M., Reasonable Doubts: The Criminal Justice System and the O. J. Simpson Case (New York: Touchstone 1997).Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1977).Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (Cambridge, Mass.:Harvard University Press 1986).Dworkin, Ronald, “Rights as Trumps,” in Waldron, Jeremy, ed., Theories of Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1994), 153–67.Ferren, John, “The Corporate Lawyer’s Obligation to the Public Interest,” Business Lawyer 33: 1253–69 (1978).Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1980).Fish, Stanley, Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1982).Fisher, William W., et al., eds., American Legal Realism (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1993).Fiss, Owen M., “Objectivity and Interpretation,” Stanford Law Review 34: 739–63 (1982).Flathman, Richard E., “Legitimacy,” in Goodin, Robert E., Pettit, Philip, and Pogge, Thomas, eds., A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2nd edn. 2012), pp. 678–84.Flood, John, “Will There Be Fallout from Clementi? The Repercussions for the Legal Profession after the Legal Services Act 2007,” Michigan State Law Review 2012: 537–65 (2012).Flood, John A., Barristers’ Clerks: The Law’s Middlemen (Manchester: Manchester University Press 1983).Foot, Philippa, “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect,” in Virtues and Vices (Berkeley: University of California Press 1978), pp. 19–32.Fox, Lawrence J., “The Fallout from Enron: Media Frenzy and Misguided Notions of Public Relations Are No Reason to Abandon Our Commitment to Our Clients,” Illinois Law Review 2003: 1243–59 (2003).Frankena, William K., Ethics (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1963).Freedman, Monroe, and Smith, Abbe, Understanding Lawyers’ Ethics (New Providence, N.J.: Lexis-Nexis, 4th edn., 2010).Freedman, Monroe H., “Why It’s Essential to Represent ‘Those People,’” in Smith, Abbe and Freedman, Monroe H., eds., How Can You Represent Those People? (New York: Palgrave MacMillan 2013), pp. 73–80.Freedman, Monroe H., “The Lawyer’s Moral Obligation of Justification,” Texas Law Review 74: 111–18 (1995).Freedman, Monroe H., Lawyers’ Ethics in an Adversary System (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill 1975).Freeman, Samuel, “John Rawls – An Introduction,” in Freeman, Samuel, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003), pp. 1–61.Fried, Charles, “The Lawyer as Friend: The Moral Foundations of the Lawyer-Client Relation,” Yale Law Journal 85: 1060–89 (1976).Fried, Charles, Contract as Promise (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1981).Fuller, Lon L., “Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart,” Harvard Law Review 71: 630–72 (1958).Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2d edn., 1964).Fuller, Lon L., and Randall, John D., “Professional Responsibility: Report of the Joint Conference,” American Bar Association Journal 44: 1159–62, 1216–18 (1958).Gallie, W. B., “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167–198 (1956).Gilbert, Margaret, “Group Membership and Political Obligation,” The Monist 76: 119–31 (1993).Gilbert, Margaret, A Theory of Political Obligation (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006).Gilovich, Thomas, and Griffin, Dale W., “Judgment and Decision Making,” in Gilovich, Thomas, Keltner, Dacher, and Nisbett, Richard E., eds., Social Psychology (New York: Norton, 2d edn., 2011), pp. 542–88.Glendon, Mary Ann, A Nation under Lawyers (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux 1994).Green, Leslie, “Law and Obligations,” in Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence & Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002), pp. 514–47.Greenawalt, Kent, Conflicts of Law and Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1989).Harr, Jonathan, A Civil Action (New York: Random House 1995).Hart, H. L. A., “Are There Any Natural Rights?,” Philosophical Review 64: 175–91 (1955).Hart, H. L. A., “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” Harvard Law Review 71: 593–629 (1958).Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2d edn., 1994) (with Postscript edited by Bulloch, Penelope A. and Raz, Joseph).Hazard, Geoffrey C., Ethics in the Practice of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press 1978).Hazard, Geoffrey C., “Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?,” Yale Law Journal 95: 1523–35 (1986) (book review).Hazard, Geoffrey C., and Dondi, Angelo, Legal Ethics: A Comparative Study (Stanford: Stanford University Press 2004).Hazard, Geoffrey C., and Remus, Dana A., “Advocacy Revalued,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 159: 751–81 (2011).Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb, “Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning,” Yale Law Journal 26: 710–70 (1917).Horwitz, Morton, The Transformation of American Law, 1780–1860 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1977).Hume, David, “On the Original Contract,” in Barker, Ernest, ed., Social Contract (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1947), pp. 147–66.Hutchinson, Allan C., “Calgary and Everything After: A Postmodern Re-Vision of Lawyering,” Alberta Law Review 33: 768–86 (1995).Jackall, Robert, Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1988).Janis, Irvin, Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin 1972).Johnston, David, A Brief History of Justice (Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell 2011).Joseph, Lawrence, Lawyerland: What Lawyers Talk About When They Talk About Law (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux 1997).Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking, Fast and Slow (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux 2011).Kant, Immanuel, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals (Ellington, James W., trans.) (Indianapolis: Hackett 1981).Kelman, Mark, A Guide to Critical Legal Studies (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1987).Kennedy, Duncan, A Critique of Adjudication {fin de siècle} (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1997).Koniak, Susan P., “When the Hurlyburly’s Done: The Bar’s Struggle with the SEC,” Columbia Law Review 103: 1236–80 (2003).Kramer, Matthew H., Objectivity and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007).Kronman, Anthony T., The Lost Lawyer: Failing Ideals of the Legal Profession (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1993).Kruse, Katherine R., “The Human Dignity of Clients,” Cornell Law Review 93: 1343–64 (2008).Kruse, Katherine R., “Beyond Cardboard Clients in Legal Ethics,” Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 23: 103–54 (2010).Kunen, James S., “How Can You Defend Those People?”: The Making of a Criminal Lawyer (New York: Random House 1983).Lahav, Alexandra D., “Portraits of Resistance: Lawyer Responses to Unjust Proceedings,” UCLA Law Review 57: 725–87 (2010).Langevoort, Donald C., “The Epistemology of Corporate-Securities Lawyering: Beliefs, Biases, and Organizational Behavior,” Brooklyn Law Review 63: 629–76 (1997).Leiter, Brian, “Legal Realism,” in Patterson, Dennis, ed., A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory (Oxford: Blackwell 1996), pp. 261–79.Levin, Yuval, The Great Debate: Edmund Burke, Thomas Paine, and the Birth of Right and Left (New York: Basic Books 2014).Locke, John, Second Treatise of Civil Government (1690), ch. IV, sec. 22. Macpherson, C., ed. (Indianapolis: Hackett 1980).Loo, Dennis D., and Grimes, Ruth-Ellen M., “Polls, Politics, and Crime: The ‘Law and Order’ Issue of the 1960s,” Western Criminology Review 5: 50–67 (2004).Luban, David, “Paternalism and the Legal Profession,” Wisconsin Law Review 1981: 454–93 (1981).Luban, David, “The Adversary System Excuse,” in Luban, David, ed., The Good Lawyer: Lawyers’ Roles and Lawyers’ Ethics (Totowa, N.J.: Rowman & Allanheld 1983), pp. 83–122.Luban, David, “The Lysistratian Prerogative: A Response to Stephen Pepper,” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1986: 637–49 (1986).Luban, David, Lawyers and Justice (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1988).Luban, David, Legal Ethics and Human Dignity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007).Luban, David, “Lawfare and Legal Ethics in Guantánamo,” Stanford Law Review 60: 1981–2026 (2008).Luban, David, “The Conscience of a Prosecutor,” Valparaiso University Law Review 45: 1–31 (2010).Lyons, David, Ethics and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984).MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 2d edn., 1984).Margulies, Joseph, Guantánamo and the Abuse of Presidential Power (New York: Simon & Schuster 2006).Markovits, Daniel, A Modern Legal Ethics (Princeton: Princeton University Press 2008).Marmor, Andrei, Philosophy of Law (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2011).Merryman, John Henry, The Civil Law Tradition (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2d edn., 1985).Mitchell, John B., “The Ethics of the Criminal Defense Attorney – New Answers to Old Questions,” Stanford Law Review 32: 293–337 (1980).Mitchell, John B., “Reasonable Doubts Are Where You Find Them,” Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 1: 339–61 (1987).Morris, Herbert, “Persons and Punishment,” The Monist 52: 475–501 (1968).Muller, Ingo, Hitler’s Justice: The Courts of the Third Reich (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1992).Murphy, Mark C., Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006).Nagel, Thomas, “The Fragmentation of Value,” in Mortal Questions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1979), pp. 128–41.Neiman, Susan, Evil in Modern Thought (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2002.Nussbaum, Martha C., Sex and Social Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1999).Ogletree, Charles J., “Beyond Justifications: Seeking Motivations to Sustain Public Defenders,” Harvard Law Review 106: 1239–94 (1993).Olson, Edgar O., “Is Rent Control Good Social Policy?,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 67: 921–45 (1991).Parker, Christine, and Evans, Adrian, Inside Lawyers’ Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007).Pennington, Nancy, and Hastie, Reid, “A Cognitive Theory of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model,” Cardozo Law Review 13: 519–57 (1991).Pepper, Stephen L., “The Lawyer’s Amoral Ethical Role: A Defense, A Problem, and Some Possibilities,” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 1986: 613–35 (1986).Pitkin, Hanna, “Obligation and Consent – I,” American Political Science Review 59: 990–99 (1965).Plato, “Crito,” Tredennick, Hugh, trans., in Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington, eds., Plato: The Complete Dialogues (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1961).Postema, Gerald J., “Moral Responsibility and Professional Ethics,” New York University Law Review 55: 63–89 (1980).Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1971).Rawls, John, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press 1993).Rawls, John, “Legal Obligation and the Duty of Fair Play,” in Freeman, Samuel, ed., John Rawls: Collected Papers (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1999), pp. 117–29.Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1979).Raz, Joseph, “Rights-Based Moralities,” in Waldron, Jeremy, ed., Theories of Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1984), pp. 182–200.Raz, Joseph, The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1986).Raz, Joseph, “Authority, Law, and Morality,” in Ethics in the Public Domain (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1994).Raz, Joseph, “Incorporation By Law,” Legal Theory 10: 1–17 (2004).Reath, Andrews, “Kant’s Moral Philosophy,” in Crisp, Roger, ed., The Oxford Handbook of the History of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013), pp. 443–64.Regan, Milton C., Eat What You Kill: The Fall of a Wall Street Lawyer (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press 2004).Rhode, Deborah L., In the Interests of Justice: Reforming the Legal Profession (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000).Ross, W. D., The Right and the Good (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1930).Ross, Ysaiah, Ethics in Law: Lawyers’ Responsibility and Accountability in Australia (Chatswood, N.S.W.: Butterworths, 10th edn., 2010).Sarat, Austin, “The Profession Versus the Public Interest: Reflections on Two Reifications,” Stanford Law Review 54: 1491–99 (2002).Sartre, Jean-Paul, “Existentialism Is a Humanism,” (Mairet, Philip, trans.) in Kaufmann, Walter, ed., Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre (New York: Meridian 1957), pp. 287–311.Scanlon, T. M., What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1998).Schauer, Frederick, The Force of Law (manuscript, forthcoming).Scheffler, Samuel, ed., Consequentialism and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1988).Schwartz, Murray, “The Professionalism and Accountability of Lawyers,” California Law Review 66: 669–98 (1978).Shaffer, Thomas L., On Being a Christian and a Lawyer (Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press 1981).Shapiro, Scott J., “Authority,” in Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002), pp. 382–439.Shapiro, Scott J., “The ‘Hart-Dworkin’ Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed,” in Ripstein, Arthur, ed., Ronald Dworkin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007), pp. 22–55.Shapiro, Scott J., Legality (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 2011).Shiffrin, Seana Valentine, “Promising, Intimate Relationships, and Conventionalism,” Philosophical Review 117: 481–524 (2008).Simmons, A. John, Moral Principles and Political Obligations (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1979).Simmons, A. John, “Associative Political Obligations,” Ethics 106: 247–73 (1996).Simmons, A. John, Political Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008).Simon, William H., “The Ideology of Advocacy: Procedural Justice and Professional Ethics,” Wisconsin Law Review 1978: 29–144 (1978).Simon, William H., “Ethical Discretion in Lawyering,” Harvard Law Review 101: 1083–1145 (1988).Simon, William H., The Practice of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1998).Simon, William H., “Authoritarian Legal Ethics: Bradley Wendel and the Positivist Turn,” Texas Law Review 90: 709–26 (2012).Singer, Peter, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–43 (1972).Smith, Abbe, “Defending Defending: The Case for Unmitigated Zeal on Behalf of People Who Do Terrible Things,” Hofstra Law Review 28: 925–61 (2000).Smith, Abbe, and Freedman, Monroe H., How Can You Represent Those People? (New York: Palgrave MacMillan 2013).Smith, Clive Stafford, Eight O’clock Ferry to the Windward Side: Seeking Justice in Guantánamo Bay (New York: Nation Books 2007).Smith, M. B. E., “Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law?,” Yale Law Journal 82: 950–76 (1973).Susskind, Richard, The End of Lawyers? Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services (Oxford University Press, 2008).Tenbrunsel, Ann E., and Messick, David M., “Ethical Fading: The Role of Self-Deception in Unethical Behavior,” Social Justice Research 17: 223–36 (2004).Thomson, Judith Jarvis, “The Trolley Problem,” Yale Law Journal 94: 1395–1415 (1985).Tigar, Michael E., “Defending,” Texas Law Review 74: 101–110 (1995).Tigar, Michael E., “Litigators’ Ethics,” Tennessee Law Review 67: 409–24 (2000).Tuck, Richard, “Hobbes,” in Great Political Thinkers (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1992).Unger, Roberto Mangabeira, Knowledge and Politics (New York: Free Press 1987).Vaughan, Diane, The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA (Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1996).Vischer, Robert K., Martin Luther King Jr. and the Morality of Legal Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013).Waldron, Jeremy, “A Right to Do Wrong,” Ethics 92: 21–39 (1981).Waldron, Jeremy, “Two Sides of the Coin,” in Liberal Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1993), pp. 1–34.Waldron, Jeremy, “Rights,” in Goodin, Robert E., Pettit, Philip and Pogge, Thomas, eds., A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2d edn., 2012), pp. 745–54.Walker, A. D. M., “Political Obligation and the Argument from Gratitude,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 17: 191–211 (1988).Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books 1983).Webb, Duncan, Ethics, Professional Responsibility and the Lawyer (Wellington: Butterworths 2000).Weber, Max, “Bureaucracy,” in Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright, ed. and trans., From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1946), pp. 196–244.Wendel, W. Bradley, Lawyers and Fidelity to Law (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2010).White, James Boyd, Heracles’ Bow: Essays on the Rhetoric and Poetics of the Law (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press 1985).Wilkins, David B., “Legal Realism for Lawyers,” Harvard Law Review 104: 468–524 (1990).Williams, Bernard, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1985).Williams, Patricia J., “The Pain of Word Bondage,” in The Alchemy of Race and Rights (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press 1991), pp. 146–65.Wishman, Seymour, Confessions of a Criminal Lawyer (New York: Times Books 1981).Wolff, Robert Paul, In Defense of Anarchy (New York: Harper & Row 1970).Wolff, Robert Paul, “The Conflict Between Authority and Autonomy,” in Raz, Joseph, ed., Authority (New York: New York University Press 1990), pp. 20–31.Woolley, Alice, Understanding Lawyers’ Ethics in Canada (Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis 2011).Woolley, Alice, et al., Lawyers’ Ethics and Professional Regulation (Markham, Ont.: LexisNexis 2008).Young, Iris Marion, Justice and the Politics of Difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press 1990).Zimbardo, Philip, The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil (New York: Random House 2008).Ziv, Neta, “Lawyers Talking Rights and Clients Breaking Rules: Between Legal Positivism and Distributive Justice in Israeli Poverty Lawyering,” Clinical Law Review 11: 209–39 (2004).
Metrics
Full text views
Full text views help
Close Full text views help
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views for chapters in this book.
Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...
Book summary page views
Book summary page views help
Close Book summary page views help
Book summary views reflect the number of visits to the book and chapter landing pages.
Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.
Usage data cannot currently be displayed.
Librarians
Authors
Publishing partners
Agents
Corporates
Additional Information
Accessibility
Our blog
News
Contact and help
Cambridge Core legal notices
Feedback
Sitemap
Select your country preference
Afghanistan
Aland Islands
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Bouvet Island
Brazil
British Indian Ocean Territory
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Channel Islands, Isle of Man
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote D'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
French Southern Territories
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Heard and Mc Donald Islands
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Korea, Republic of
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States of
Moldova, Republic of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
Northern Mariana Islands
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Territory, Occupied
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
Spain
Sri Lanka
St. Helena
St. Pierre and Miquelon
Sudan
Suriname
Svalbard and Jan Mayen Islands
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syrian Arab Republic
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic of
Thailand
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
United States Minor Outlying Islands
United States Virgin Islands
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City
Venezuela
Vietnam
Virgin Islands (British)
Wallis and Futuna Islands
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Join us online
Legal Information
Rights & Permissions
Copyright
Privacy Notice
Terms of use
Cookies Policy
© Cambridge University Press 2024
Back to top
© Cambridge University Press 2024
Back to top
Cancel
Confirm
×
-1.3 %����108 0 obj <> endobj
xref
108 32
0000000016 00000 n
0000001568 00000 n
0000001905 00000 n
0000001948 00000 n
0000002101 00000 n
0000002256 00000 n
0000002550 00000 n
0000002592 00000 n
0000002730 00000 n
0000002869 00000 n
0000003009 00000 n
0000003797 00000 n
0000004418 00000 n
0000004477 00000 n
0000005973 00000 n
0000006579 00000 n
0000007084 00000 n
0000007255 00000 n
0000007327 00000 n
0000017355 00000 n
0000017399 00000 n
0000017453 00000 n
0000034284 00000 n
0000034532 00000 n
0000035052 00000 n
0000035179 00000 n
0000035292 00000 n
0000041312 00000 n
0000047328 00000 n
0000047399 00000 n
0000047456 00000 n
0000000936 00000 n
trailer
<]>>
startxref
0
%%EOF
139 0 obj<>stream
x�b```f``Ua`e``�� �� @1v�L ��D�ز����������ۙ9����q�+�����+fQ!��)����������J�1dA��eI+�>2��)ں��Q�e�Q����I��M�@A�mgom�YS�A�c�Z�ʤg�O/4<�sl�y����L�J�\��~�������)��)��E̝3�<�U&�t:1wη�@�j��ܹ1j���*>����� �а�0 ��l78;4,-- �k {>-��e��d���6���1�[�MPf`,w�2@�M������<�L�X�\t�,(8�3�шg����ӣ��0�0T0|�^ Π4G���������c� q�?0�q�`�c�Šc��s�x�*�X�0�|�*��>��}�X?���@�c C�(}�X0��� Y�Qh�$��q 02 =�>H�0�s�
-{��3?i���&S~NXا�p�'�x����9EWV����Y�ֲb�]����Z�� iF � ` � ��
endstream endobj 109 0 obj<><><>]>>/OCGs[112 0 R]>>/OpenAction 110 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 110 0 obj<> endobj 111 0 obj<>/Encoding<>>>>> endobj 112 0 obj<>/PageElement<>/View<>/Print<>>>/Name(Watermark)/Type/OCG>> endobj 113 0 obj<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>>/Type/Page>> endobj 114 0 obj[115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R] endobj 115 0 obj<>>>>> endobj 116 0 obj<>>>>> endobj 117 0 obj<>>>>> endobj 118 0 obj<> endobj 119 0 obj<> endobj 120 0 obj<> endobj 121 0 obj<>stream
H��W]o�6}��У8�o�eX۴E[��a�e:bK�.I%u�.u)Yv�{�d��<<����~�,��|���Y�X/���_�`�[�`]��?�����w7��H�����=�IAYOF�8I�u����F�fyeIXu[�����q���ݢ$I�d��:IJ�p\��5�[�a�P`˚o{��բ���a��>
�4JnEw?"�)�V��☼ �Q�������E�H͆7����l��b#=�{��ҳ�)�3V�ޡ1�"��F�����}���(Pm/��˔dQ!Z��=^i�� ��8䃴N����`2���N�'WZ�(��h�Vm��+ r�陣InW����,��G�6_�j+��~�ݖ{�J���Z5*И:6k�]]��.��-ﬨ�����C��r���0KI��>x47{p��g6�N~�`Y���b�{�xސ��(b�;E��A�U} ��-�a��]B�RR�E�(���7s�qkYAlָ�(.?i<ľR�o����V8sN�;�������p�))r�#�G�{e�´+dj�:�x�7���b�4b�������+|P�������&>li��I¾���ʛE�9�[tytt�Nm���FGG�U�Qmu��q* �n- {���С))�؇N�R;unA�s$��!�Ǥ<���!�}���jL]O+�(��F%#� �Z�V���a�;Ï�E���u?��<�A�s����W��.��R@���"'�3�XZ�eK/5�hF�j���w�wJag���#�j7��3f:���u>��Xp#aI�cd
H\:��QP��Y��`l Q"�G!�X���|��%N�U����*�Bc����� 0X��g1=qp�[�@�S�
��堜��1�fȀ,�j��'�:!c�i�9d������ �K7�d.qs)�(�]���YAhil��S���o�no�^^�9ԭe������@x;`�A0�0�����X����J�S�n1�Q��@�K�;.}���~��$ASo���q g&qY�S�+(f��9Ζ�s��O�,�HVDř�[�$s9�א��ueO &�R�4�Q�����tǻ�ӻ�Q[g��(/��&剹�#��>���O���HS��ߟ��`��@���p��F6n��e�av�i0�N�m�PU�xy~������F|�\���Z�+���Ϩĝ*g09�� (xVYBJ�P��}�V����᧫�z�^4�[�E��6�&��qz��n�& o���46���}G���^�/|�4y6�;~Ҍ�i�/0�'�J�F*j���z�u�(��e��U�4�h��Aݺ�%s���- ^�ş�� :I��
endstream endobj 122 0 obj<> endobj 123 0 obj<> endobj 124 0 obj<> endobj 125 0 obj<> endobj 126 0 obj<>>>/Matrix[1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0]/Group 128 0 R/Resources<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/Properties<>/ExtGState<>>>/Type/XObject/BBox[0.0 14.5693 493.2 845.2]/LastModified(D:20141126211942+05'30')/FormType 1>>stream
/Layer /MC0 BDC
0.729 0.753 0.776 rg
1 i
/GS0 gs
0 809.273 493.2 35.927 re
f
q
0 845.2 493.2 -845.2 re
W n
q
1 0 0 1 27.7899933 832.2075043 cm
1 1 1 rg
0 0 m
0.525 -2.677 l
-0.182 -2.82 l
-0.609 -1.04 -2.112 0.111 -4.013 0.111 c
-6.343 0.111 -8.078 -1.955 -8.078 -4.726 c
-8.078 -7.582 -6.271 -9.667 -3.793 -9.667 c
-1.833 -9.667 -0.462 -8.54 0.058 -6.502 c
0.765 -6.594 l
0.473 -9.181 l
-1.335 -10.125 -2.646 -10.499 -4.166 -10.499 c
-7.811 -10.499 -10.291 -8.123 -10.291 -4.632 c
-10.291 -1.267 -7.892 0.974 -4.291 0.974 c
-2.861 0.974 -1.995 0.788 -0.298 0.117 c
-0.232 0.091 -0.133 0.051 0 0 c
f
Q
q
1 0 0 1 41.7680969 831.2646027 cm
1 1 1 rg
0 0 m
0.33 -0.711 0.453 -0.967 0.862 -1.792 c
1.224 -2.522 1.455 -2.992 1.556 -3.202 c
2.127 -4.391 l
2.684 -5.522 l
2.878 -5.924 l
3.205 -5.298 3.317 -5.067 3.65 -4.332 c
4.266 -2.975 l
4.914 -1.552 l
5.446 -0.343 l
5.595 0 l
8.817 0 l
8.817 -0.435 l
8.583 -0.39 8.519 -0.382 8.385 -0.382 c
7.497 -0.382 7.339 -0.685 7.339 -2.391 c
7.339 -5.761 l
7.339 -7.393 7.531 -7.777 8.353 -7.777 c
8.485 -7.777 8.652 -7.757 8.869 -7.717 c
8.869 -8.153 l
4.253 -8.153 l
4.253 -7.717 l
4.392 -7.757 4.512 -7.777 4.624 -7.777 c
5.397 -7.777 5.595 -7.365 5.595 -5.761 c
5.595 -1.611 l
5.49 -1.814 5.412 -1.969 5.361 -2.072 c
5.323 -2.151 5.13 -2.566 4.784 -3.318 c
4.143 -4.716 l
3.436 -6.315 l
3.076 -7.128 2.87 -7.595 2.82 -7.717 c
2.786 -7.797 2.737 -7.918 2.671 -8.081 c
2.139 -8.081 l
1.958 -7.678 l
1.295 -6.207 1.18 -5.961 0.693 -4.957 c
0.039 -3.605 l
-0.301 -2.904 -0.519 -2.458 -0.616 -2.267 c
-0.683 -2.135 -0.784 -1.938 -0.92 -1.675 c
-0.92 -6.158 l
-0.92 -7.375 -0.642 -7.776 0.205 -7.776 c
0.342 -7.776 0.421 -7.762 0.551 -7.717 c
0.551 -8.153 l
-3.008 -8.153 l
-3.008 -7.717 l
-2.871 -7.753 -2.713 -7.779 -2.617 -7.779 c
-1.808 -7.779 -1.621 -7.4 -1.621 -5.761 c
-1.621 -1.993 l
-1.621 -0.693 -1.807 -0.382 -2.587 -0.382 c
-2.746 -0.382 -2.83 -0.394 -2.956 -0.435 c
-2.956 0 l
0 0 l
f
Q
q
1 0 0 1 75.8179016 823.5478973 cm
1 1 1 rg
0 0 m
0 -0.436 l
-5.349 -0.436 l
-5.349 0 l
-5.095 -0.042 -4.913 -0.059 -4.713 -0.059 c
-3.738 -0.059 -3.547 0.271 -3.547 1.956 c
-3.547 5.326 l
-3.547 7.025 -3.728 7.335 -4.721 7.335 c
-4.946 7.335 -5.03 7.326 -5.239 7.282 c
-5.239 7.717 l
-0.045 7.717 l
-0.045 7.282 l
-0.292 7.325 -0.399 7.335 -0.651 7.335 c
-1.661 7.335 -1.848 7.02 -1.848 5.326 c
-1.848 1.956 l
-1.848 0.283 -1.649 -0.059 -0.673 -0.059 c
-0.463 -0.059 -0.229 -0.038 0 0 c
f
Q
q
1 0 0 1 94.9853973 831.3350067 cm
1 1 1 rg
0 0 m
0.409 -2.079 l
-0.201 -2.19 l
-0.718 -0.727 -1.547 -0.071 -2.883 -0.071 c
-4.788 -0.071 -6.049 -1.49 -6.049 -3.634 c
-6.049 -5.917 -4.645 -7.536 -2.667 -7.536 c
-2.175 -7.536 -1.812 -7.47 -1.355 -7.296 c
-1.355 -5.049 l
-1.355 -4.416 -1.565 -4.183 -2.136 -4.183 c
-2.202 -4.183 -2.301 -4.188 -2.431 -4.197 c
-2.528 -4.203 l
-2.528 -3.722 l
1.53 -3.722 l
1.53 -4.203 l
1.401 -4.197 l
1.232 -4.183 l
1.18 -4.182 l
0.445 -4.182 0.291 -4.393 0.291 -5.401 c
0.291 -5.991 0.309 -6.843 0.338 -7.543 c
-0.145 -7.632 -0.661 -7.736 -1.076 -7.829 c
-2.286 -8.097 -2.786 -8.167 -3.494 -8.167 c
-6.074 -8.167 -7.828 -6.459 -7.828 -3.947 c
-7.828 -1.295 -6.04 0.37 -3.194 0.37 c
-2.714 0.37 -2.17 0.326 -1.627 0.241 c
-0.92 0.129 l
-0.285 0.045 l
0 0 l
f
Q
q
1 0 0 1 104.2577972 831.2646027 cm
1 1 1 rg
0 0 m
0.311 -1.76 l
-0.175 -1.852 l
-0.389 -0.8 -0.883 -0.519 -2.512 -0.519 c
-2.988 -0.519 -3.31 -0.552 -3.838 -0.656 c
-3.838 -3.507 l
-2.405 -3.507 l
-1.606 -3.507 -1.38 -3.332 -1.38 -2.71 c
-1.38 -2.612 -1.384 -2.554 -1.4 -2.409 c
-0.914 -2.409 l
-0.914 -5.183 l
-1.4 -5.183 l
-1.377 -4.936 -1.374 -4.887 -1.374 -4.793 c
-1.374 -4.255 -1.642 -4.066 -2.405 -4.066 c
-3.838 -4.066 l
-3.838 -7.43 l
-2.081 -7.43 l
-0.722 -7.43 -0.285 -7.157 0.22 -5.983 c
0.24 -5.937 0.271 -5.867 0.311 -5.775 c
0.83 -5.957 l
0.065 -8.153 l
-7.313 -8.153 l
-7.313 -7.717 l
-7.084 -7.757 -6.88 -7.776 -6.664 -7.776 c
-5.718 -7.776 -5.51 -7.414 -5.51 -5.761 c
-5.51 -2.391 l
-5.51 -0.711 -5.705 -0.382 -6.699 -0.382 c
-6.914 -0.382 -7.018 -0.392 -7.203 -0.435 c
-7.203 0 l
0 0 l
f
Q
q
1 0 0 1 33.8130035 831.7588043 cm
1 1 1 rg
0 0 m
1.479 -3.709 l
1.563 -3.924 l
3.059 -7.73 3.398 -8.277 4.263 -8.277 c
4.371 -8.277 4.503 -8.252 4.629 -8.211 c
4.629 -8.647 l
0.13 -8.647 l
0.13 -8.211 l
0.328 -8.261 0.393 -8.271 0.577 -8.271 c
1.035 -8.271 1.259 -8.106 1.259 -7.766 c
1.259 -7.67 1.224 -7.524 1.161 -7.354 c
0.674 -6.047 l
-2.094 -6.047 l
-2.477 -7.041 l
-2.548 -7.237 l
-2.632 -7.463 l
-2.661 -7.556 -2.679 -7.665 -2.679 -7.748 c
-2.679 -8.079 -2.396 -8.277 -1.917 -8.277 c
-1.755 -8.277 -1.681 -8.267 -1.439 -8.211 c
-1.439 -8.647 l
-5.005 -8.647 l
-5.005 -8.211 l
-4.828 -8.253 -4.748 -8.265 -4.622 -8.265 c
-3.972 -8.265 -3.659 -7.921 -3.119 -6.619 c
-2.911 -6.119 l
-2.788 -5.827 l
-0.37 0 l
h
-0.681 -2.547 m
-1.874 -5.451 l
0.454 -5.451 l
-0.681 -2.547 l
f
Q
q
1 0 0 1 51.5771027 830.8296051 cm
1 1 1 rg
0 0 m
0 0.435 l
2.904 0.435 l
3.166 0.435 3.599 0.448 4.318 0.474 c
4.668 0.488 4.935 0.495 5.119 0.495 c
6.604 0.495 7.488 -0.153 7.488 -1.239 c
7.488 -2.285 6.789 -2.966 5.407 -3.267 c
7.042 -3.386 7.812 -4.034 7.812 -5.286 c
7.812 -6.878 6.563 -7.744 4.265 -7.744 c
4.098 -7.744 3.839 -7.739 3.488 -7.731 c
2.697 -7.718 l
-0.123 -7.718 l
-0.123 -7.282 l
0.113 -7.323 0.302 -7.341 0.519 -7.341 c
1.48 -7.341 1.673 -7.003 1.673 -5.326 c
1.673 -1.956 l
1.673 -0.253 1.493 0.053 0.491 0.053 c
0.284 0.053 0.218 0.046 0 0 c
3.294 -3.099 m
3.482 -3.131 3.725 -3.15 3.928 -3.15 c
5.032 -3.15 5.848 -2.387 5.848 -1.355 c
5.848 -0.545 5.151 0.06 4.215 0.06 c
3.932 0.06 3.767 0.025 3.294 -0.129 c
h
3.294 -7.087 m
3.66 -7.17 3.948 -7.204 4.27 -7.204 c
5.326 -7.204 6.069 -6.397 6.069 -5.245 c
6.069 -4.193 5.309 -3.597 3.969 -3.597 c
3.749 -3.597 3.634 -3.609 3.294 -3.67 c
3.294 -7.087 l
f
Q
q
1 0 0 1 60.737793 830.8296051 cm
1 1 1 rg
0 0 m
0 0.435 l
2.677 0.435 l
3.286 0.455 l
3.909 0.474 l
4.439 0.492 4.62 0.496 4.757 0.496 c
6.596 0.496 7.501 -0.154 7.501 -1.472 c
7.501 -2.68 6.78 -3.387 5.387 -3.547 c
6.199 -3.978 6.494 -4.299 7.086 -5.399 c
7.875 -6.865 8.316 -7.315 8.962 -7.315 c
9.033 -7.315 9.067 -7.312 9.329 -7.282 c
9.329 -7.718 l
8.188 -7.718 l
7.793 -7.731 l
7.444 -7.738 l
6.648 -7.738 6.301 -7.48 5.782 -6.502 c
5.452 -5.88 l
4.592 -4.255 4.216 -3.919 3.261 -3.911 c
3.261 -5.326 l
3.261 -7.013 3.449 -7.341 4.418 -7.341 c
4.602 -7.341 4.757 -7.324 4.972 -7.282 c
4.972 -7.718 l
-0.13 -7.718 l
-0.13 -7.282 l
0.113 -7.322 0.314 -7.341 0.505 -7.341 c
1.393 -7.341 1.673 -6.952 1.673 -5.723 c
1.673 -1.558 l
1.673 -0.326 1.401 0.053 0.516 0.053 c
0.317 0.053 0.186 0.04 0 0 c
3.261 -3.45 m
3.51 -3.472 3.617 -3.478 3.797 -3.478 c
5.079 -3.478 5.77 -2.823 5.77 -1.603 c
5.77 -0.594 5.125 0.079 4.16 0.079 c
3.888 0.079 3.55 0.023 3.261 -0.072 c
3.261 -3.45 l
f
Q
q
1 0 0 1 76.7451019 830.8296051 cm
1 1 1 rg
0 0 m
0 0.435 l
2.833 0.435 l
3.416 0.455 l
4.11 0.474 l
4.59 0.488 4.919 0.495 5.098 0.495 c
7.943 0.495 9.446 -0.768 9.446 -3.156 c
9.446 -5.943 7.477 -7.743 4.428 -7.743 c
3.527 -7.724 l
2.937 -7.718 l
-0.091 -7.718 l
-0.091 -7.282 l
0.142 -7.321 0.365 -7.341 0.57 -7.341 c
1.545 -7.341 1.744 -6.998 1.744 -5.326 c
1.744 -1.956 l
1.744 -0.262 1.556 0.053 0.546 0.053 c
0.314 0.053 0.221 0.044 0 0 c
3.429 -7.028 m
3.967 -7.202 4.273 -7.256 4.711 -7.256 c
6.491 -7.256 7.624 -5.724 7.624 -3.317 c
7.624 -1.206 6.547 0.013 4.682 0.013 c
4.257 0.013 3.908 -0.045 3.429 -0.195 c
3.429 -7.028 l
f
Q
q
1 0 0 1 129.2738953 809.199707 cm
1 1 1 RG
1 w 4 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
0 0 m
0 36 l
S
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 743.9194031 cm
0.082 0.024 0.4 RG
1 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
0 0 m
493.229 0 l
S
Q
Q
0 0 0.945 rg
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
-0.016 Tc 0.016 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 9 0 0 9 389.9204 19.1279 Tm
(www)Tj
-0.015 Tc 0.015 Tw [(.)1(cambridg)]TJ
0 Tc 0 Tw (e)Tj
-0.015 Tc 0.015 Tw 6.951 0 Td
(.or)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw (g)Tj
ET
q
0 845.2 493.2 -845.2 re
W n
q
1 0 0 1 390.6416016 15.0498047 cm
0 0 0.945 RG
0.96 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
0 0 m
76.82 0 l
S
Q
q
1 0 0 1 0 33.7704926 cm
0.082 0.024 0.4 RG
1 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
0 0 m
493.2 0 l
S
Q
q
1 0 0 1 17.3818054 15.0498047 cm
0 0 0.945 RG
0.96 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
0 0 m
213.96 0 l
S
Q
Q
BT
/TT0 1 Tf
9 0 0 9 17.3862 19.1279 Tm
(\251)Tj
0.967 0 Td
( )Tj
0.385 0 Td
(i)Tj
0.317 0 Td
(n)Tj
0.616 0 Td
( )Tj
0.024 Tc -0.024 Tw 0.385 0 Td
(this)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj
0.024 Tc -0.024 Tw 2.134 0 Td
(web)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj
0.024 Tc -0.024 Tw 2.238 0 Td
(se)Tj
0.025 Tc -0.025 Tw (rv)Tj
0.024 Tc -0.024 Tw (ice)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj
0.024 Tc -0.024 Tw 3.607 0 Td
(Ca)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw (m)Tj
2.1 0 Td
(b)Tj
0.584 0 Td
(r)Tj
0.024 Tc -0.024 Tw 0.435 0 Td
(idge)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj
2.341 0 Td
(U)Tj
0.78 0 Td
(n)Tj
0.616 0 Td
(i)Tj
0.317 0 Td
(v)Tj
0.522 0 Td
(e)Tj
0.507 0 Td
(r)Tj
0.024 Tc -0.024 Tw 0.435 0 Td
(sity)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj
0.025 Tc -0.025 Tw 2.044 0 Td
(Pr)Tj
0.024 Tc -0.024 Tw (es)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw (s)Tj
0 0 0 rg
0.038 Tc -0.038 Tw -21.317 86.252 Td
(Cambri)Tj
0.037 Tc -0.037 Tw (dge)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj
5.594 0 Td
(U)Tj
0.038 Tc -0.038 Tw 0.793 0 Td
(niv)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw (e)Tj
0.038 Tc -0.038 Tw 2.015 0 Td
(rsi)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw (t)Tj
1.631 0 Td
(y)Tj
0.53 0 Td
( )Tj
0.038 Tc -0.038 Tw 0.398 0 Td
(Pr)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw (e)Tj
1.616 0 Td
(s)Tj
0.47 0 Td
(s)Tj
0.024 Tc -0.024 Tw -13.047 -1.2 Td
(978-1-107-04256-8)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj
0.024 Tc 9.356 0 Td
[(- Ethics and L)1(aw:)1( An Introduction)]TJ
-9.356 -1.2 Td
[(W.)1( Bradley Wendel)]TJ
0.042 Tc -0.042 Tw 0 -1.2 TD
(Frontmatter)Tj
0 0 0.945 rg
-0.01 Tc 0.01 Tw T*
(More)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw ( )Tj
-0.01 Tc 0.01 Tw 2.49 0 Td
(informatio)Tj
0 Tc 0 Tw (n)Tj
ET
q
0 845.2 493.2 -845.2 re
W n
q
1 0 0 1 17.4989929 748.839798 cm
0 0 0.945 RG
0.96 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
0 0 m
68.52 0 l
S
Q
EMC
Q
endstream endobj 127 0 obj<> endobj 128 0 obj<> endobj 129 0 obj<>stream
H��VTTW���f(������f����`
����"���������h�{��a�c���-��5��1�ɝq�U�{NN�;����w���@iL��.��Eԋ+�� =���sPF�5p��`=��oИl��'�e�=F�n��p�d��2|���=�'>z��˴�䔛��B���Lj�&>�=~�vSiWK����j�)i��5�����'Wn��m�Hg�oO����zuDrFj��Z_�c��53+;�X�M �#n�j}^�����@���l.����2�_�E0RE�N:��˩Htb���*���"�J��A�{OS�U�� �� yjRc%9��rʻ�5oTtz7w�R^ޥ������(W�B`�JA��WU FS5sH�5k����S�^� 5n�4�Y�-?�j�::�צm��:v�ܥk|��=z��Чo�����1pPJ��!iCӇ ��i9*+{�����O�8i�ӦϘ9k��s>�8'w��Z�p��O�,����>[�����V�Y�n�����ؼe��m���Zޮ�{�����/u��ǎ�8y*������_�x��\�v���[��ܽW�Ma�}�t��~"��M��N�"�E�8-ΊBE(n��⭄(S�e��F����u��� �-���ZN V�j�ZG��F��Ֆj�:Z�NU��m���P� O�b�mH4
�����g,g�d6�����f�����k0�ט��ϙ/����"�vG�`�D�B�|��'*/'�Y�|e���2���D݂�i��T���:Q�S��Pe�c%�u�A�ׅ��DU�5��wPmy��v��!`��8�䥏C�[�K}̯������-�Sr��V�Ƈ^\}h�m[R�i�e����ml���|�~�]`�5����k�O�?ޖfk^��hm��U�F9��F (�(�Sخ�maTa�����+��{Z�Uп�����9[����2^�sZ�d9SD�� .��[��3č�y]�ï��
�af�6X����،��E��<��=��y���+�O����g�7�b� �1�� )8�T��Y\�y\�E<�`\�e\��S,� \�u��o�>F:�b20#�� +F!���1��b&`<&b2&a?�`*�H6L���-2�
*�Q�_�+c�6l�����;۱=;�#;�3=Y�^�fvŏ������������L`�e?�g"0��x��l¦�ALa*�4�p��C_��l(�?8��,���0gG0�VV` vBcEV�H�b+�
���l��x�������F����8��N�$�X�f�p2���霁C����Zx��p��q�J�pwq(�m�V"J��\�U��j��Z��n�&~�Pn�n�6�q;wp'5�qws�r�� �y���%�+��<�c<��<���`�b>O�����/��e^a]��U��5^� ��-���Ev�&l��؇\�����c���p ��;�7oGs�sa��Z/��5tu�r���.r�Ni���qf��ځ����wx����Ҟ�&�"Y�&Y��4�39�X��{-$�2�?�#� ���@:`��j� ���Ò����%�Z��#N�u�pBzzH��KN��*������]c�u��~���(�L$ڢ�k�J��%�|Ee����<� ��/� X��� {!�)u�`��Xh��h�y�hլ{�&�5lP�^�:���BkլQ=�\�d4�U��T�T1�B�r�~e}}ʔ��*����*�0j�ѽ�*����p�]�m[S̾���Z�NR�w�*�����N�XSt��pbk������;ʝ\I��t�e�V1:%)IfĘ|U-��g�<�RѦ��R�a�+�%U/�ɵ�<ƶ�S���<���a�_�&��Lעr��b���d�����s�A��W��Qs��ܝ��C��d �j^�ќ�|10)�;Ŕ��O�\�Ę�lI��8G�c&���Nw� �Q-ij��q��$)M12�~����=�p4H�w�V6T��+�&<
Rr,�CU���3G�Vw��f��� �p��$�b����Q#��^=�� R��#��cڸ��{��g�����8�}9l�r���~�@F�H Z�& ˺4ٖvm�����IR)�*�%��f٢U��C-��)D��,ʲn�mSUUS��6����;��٬���~{������{�&�:{����Z�k0��NA`&�ߨ|�w�ڻbw��=:l���x�p��6��Z ް䶍)e�ӻ2=la��6��uMnU��5����P���Ю�
C��L����Aeì���*���� ߕ�Z���5�! }��ا����>�ߗ��'�Vf��~I�_L��zs����ZZ��\�;6V�rSx`�з+����Zwp���R@,�pP���(����F2c2��a�0��;#71^��a4�X��gUT�΅%��B�0;�)��h�| Q]�x��ښ�3�,�k���9�r�y
���吪�z��p��0O�텪�'���Dd�IdzW���ܬ�!�V�V0e��]c~� �Eo����{��,(kV=e<